Let's Look at Some Real Life Scenarios....
IMPLICATIONS FOR VR SERVICE
DELIVERY
WHAT MIGHT IT
LOOK LIKE FOR FOUR INDIVIDUALS?
POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Political climate relative to the development of
employment networks
External pressures to form alliances and composition of
those alliances
The role of outside advocacy groups
The impact on resources and reimbursement revenue
CASE
STUDIES
Jim - 40 years old
Sustained a spinal cord injury in his early
twenties
Received multiple services from VR over a period of 18
years
Services have included education, restoration and
supports
Used up almost all of his trial work months, but
consistently did not exceed SGA
Income requirements would depend on cost of buy-in
Would be willing to give up Social Security if usable
income increased
Could benefit from placement assistance
Needs a modified van for independent access to
employment
DECISION POINTS AND OPTIONS:
Has been marketed by an independent Employment Network
They will provide placement services and have developed
a plan that includes application to VR for assistance in the purchase of the
van.
Would have previously been a reimbursement case for
VR.
Reimbursement under the Ticket could come quickly given
the previous utilization of Trial Work months.
Is there an Agreement in place with this EN?
How does it address:
Cost sharing and service provision
Mr. T. -Gentleman in his early
fifties
Sustained an injury on the job
Unable to return to his previous job, had limited
capacity for light duty employment
Chose to obtain part time unskilled work, paying $7.00
per hour, working 15 hours per week.
SSDI benefit: $1000.00
Earnings
420.00
Current income 1420.00
Full time:
$1120.00
To date has opted to remain at part
time, has used Trial Work months, but never exceeded SGA.
DECISION POINTS AND OPTIONS:
Employer is a National Corporation that has decided to
become an EN.
Willing to provide On the Job Training, with a
commitment from the employee to work full time.
Mr. T. requires accommodations for classroom learning,
job modifications and restructuring.
Employer wants to partner with VR to provide the
disability related services and will provide all of the technical
training.
Should VR accept referral that does not include Ticket
provision?
What is long term benefit to the program of developing
this type of relationship and training model with such an employer?
Rene
-- A woman in her thirties with chronic mental health issues
Has received vocational services from Mental Health and
VR
Has used up Trial Work Months through cyclical
employment attempts.
Recovering from an acute episode and currently
unemployed
Currently receiving monthly benefits in the
Extended Period of Eligibility (EPE)
Benefits would stop once she returned to work above
SGA
Wants to attempt work but is afraid of jeopardizing
benefits
lacking the confidence of being able to maintain
employment and fearful of her periodic relapses.
DECISION POINTS AND OPTIONS:
Needs comprehensive benefits planning
Needs to develop a return to work plan that allows
for graduated increases in earnings and changes in benefits.
The Mental Health Agency and VR could be part of a
collaborative EN.
How can VR and MH use the service menu in existing
MOU to develop a Ticket Agreement?
JUDY -
20 year old woman with a developmental disability
Graduating from High School within the next
year
Has applied for and been approved for SS disability as
an adult
Has been referred to the Area Agency for Adult
Services
Working with a VR counselor towards
employment
Family is living in Section 8 Housing and Judy's
income would impact on the Family's housing status.
DECISION POINTS AND OPTIONS:
Employment influenced by the need to maintain extended
services paid through Medicaid
Family does not want to jeopardize SSI
eligibility
Individual and family could benefit from a futures
planning approach to identify goals and expectations
Should VR be involved in an EN with Developmental
Services?
Should this individual be served by VR with Ticket
utilization not a significant factor in vocational service planning?