The
Option of Becoming Self-Employed: an Emerging Reality
Within
Vermont Vocational Rehabilitation
Prepared
for Rehabilitation Services Administration
by
Michael
Collins
Vermont's
Choice Demonstration Project
Todays job market is vastly different from ten years ago. Corporate America can no longer be relied upon to provide secure jobs to individuals entering or returning to the work force. To increase the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation services, perhaps it is time to expand opportunities for consumers to explore self-employment. This option could serve as a path to independence for a number of persons with disabilities within vocational rehabilitation. (Forrester, 1996)
Introduction
Vermont has
long held a reputation for being an entrepreneurial state.
In fact, the Vermont Department of Economic Development reports that
Vermont is the most entrepreneurial state in the nation with 20.6% of
Vermonters reporting self-employment as the primary source of their income and
nearly 30% of employment age Vermonters reporting at least some of their
income from self-employment. Further,
the Department estimates that in the next decade, 95% of the job growth will
come in businesses with less than 10 employees and
new small and micro-business start-ups.
Vermonts
census numbers also tell us that women are making the most inroads in new
business ventures. In 1970, women owned 5% of businesses in Vermont. Now, 30%
of businesses are run by women and they are starting new businesses four times
faster than men. The gap is expected to close to 50/50 by the year 2000.
(Osborne, 1997)
The story
for people with disabilities and self-employment is not quite so encouraging.
In 1992, VR assisted 417 Vermonters with disabilities to achieve their
employment goals. In 1996, they assisted 582 people, an increase of 40% over a
five-year period. For the same five-year period, the change in the number of
people who were assisted in achieving a self-employment goal went from 25
people to 22 people, a decrease of twelve percent. Despite an
unwavering commitment from the administration of DVR, self-employment has been
slow to become a real choice for people with disabilities.
Arnold and Seekins (1994) have
surveyed the public rehabilitation system and determined that the choice of
self-employment in public rehabilitation will be greatly enhanced by
addressing the issues of conventional wisdom, state policies and counselor
fears. Education and training on the more current literature/research of
conventional wisdom as well as a more enlightened self-employment policy will
help to develop a better understanding of both what is possible (conventional
wisdom) and what is acceptable (policy).
But rehabilitation professionals who have never been self-employed will
require significant amounts of training, technical assistance and support in
order to be helpful resources to consumers who dream of owning their own
businesses.
Vermont's Response:
The Choice Project's Self-Employment Experience
Self-employment was never an
"intended outcome" of the Choice Project's strategies to increase
customer control. The project's significant involvement in self-employment has
merely been a result of honoring the choice philosophy. Self-employment as an
option has proven successful and since been embraced by Vermont VR counselors
for the following reasons:
1) Rural Options.
It offers alternative employment options in a rural state where
traditional employment opportunities are often limited or in some areas
virtually nonexistent. As previously noted, self-employment in rural areas is
the norm for a lot of Vermonters, not just Vermonters with disabilities.
2) Structural Unemployment. When the skills of the
available potential workforce and the skills needed by available businesses
don't match, job placements can't occur. All people have some marketable
skills. But there is not always a call for those skills either within the
immediate geographic area in which they reside or within reasonable commuting
distance.
3) Worksite Supports.
Self-employment often offers greater opportunity for control over
factors in the work environment that can affect productivity and performance.
For example, a home-based business can allow someone with short-term memory
loss to work in a familiar environment with minimal professional support
whereas having to go into a new environment and learn a new set of skills can
be a daunting challenge to say the least. This is a variation on the natural
supports theme so popular in supported employment literature today. (Hagner
and Dileo, 1993) A business in familiar and supportive surroundings is capable
of providing the natural supports necessary to success whereas a competitive
job without environmental and family natural supports available is likely to
ensure failure and contribute further to one's lack of self
confidence/self-esteem. This situation was referred to by one Vermont VR
customer as "achieving my downward spiraling failure syndrome"
Following is a description of
the major changes implemented in Vermont VR to add self-employment to the
array of employment options available to Vermonters with disabilities.
Changing Policy
The following excerpt from
Vermonts policy on self-employment (VR Services Manual, 1989) provides an
example of language similar to that found in many other States current
policies on self-employment.
"Self-employment is a job placement possibility
which may be considered for any eligible client; however, provision with
Division funds of equipment, initial stocks, and supplies is limited to
individuals with severe handicaps. Self-employment will normally be reserved
for those individuals with severe handicaps when
there are no other suitable placement opportunities available in sufficient
number in the community which are adaptable by pacing, modifying the worksite
or special accommodation. The
Division shall not give cash grants, nor shall Division funding be used as
collateral for a business loan or for purchased services to start or
supplement a business."
For comparison purposes, the
corresponding section of the current policy on self-employment (VR Services
Manual, revised 1997) now reads:
"Self-employment is a vocational option which may be
considered in the wide array of employment options available to an individual.
Such an option recognizes that self-employment is more prevalent in rural
areas and that people with a work disability tend to be self-employed at
higher rates than do people without a work disability. The decision to use
Division funds to support a business start-up will be based on a variety of
factors including but not being limited to total start-up costs, viability of
the business plan, potential for other financial sources and counselor
judgment. If the business plan calls for funds beyond limits set by Division
spending guidelines, the person may use the potential of Division funds to
leverage other funding and as collateral for establishing bank credit."
Implementation of a new
self-employment policy has the potential for contributing to a more responsive
system for both customers and counselors. However, the mere existence of the
revised policy does not, in and of itself, constitute a solution to the
problem.
We can clearly see the national
implications for needed state VR policy changes as well as the need for
additional research to further dispel the conventional wisdom related to
the rates of new business failures. The real challenge arises when we address
the issue of counselor fear and lack of knowledge on a national level.
Hopefully, changing policies will result in changing expectations and that is
definitely a first step towards truly including self-employment as an option.
The more difficult challenge arises with implementation of the new policy.
Changing Roles
The cornerstone of Vermonts
"choice" philosophy has been to provide our customers with education
in foundation skills such as 1) decision making, 2) problem solving, 3)
accessing resources for assistance with identified needs, and 4) taking
personal responsibility. These foundation skills are basic to any person's
ability to make informed choices and to direct the employment acquisition
process. If any person can truly be in charge/empowered and begin to make
better informed decisions, then that individual will begin to take ownership
of the results of those decisions. As VR customers become increasingly
empowered to choose from a wider variety of employment options, both counselor
and customer roles and support needs change. Nowhere has this had more impact
on the VR system than in the choice of self-employment.
Non-traditional Partnering:
Information about the wide variety of self-employment assistance already
available to potential entrepreneurs is collected and disseminated to project
participants. Vocational Rehabilitation has developed crucial linkages with
organizations that provide on-going business support and training to
self-employed people. Establishing these linkages and educating the small
business resources about reasonable accommodations and diverse learning styles
has greatly increased the utilization of these self-employment resources and
supports by people with disabilities in Vermont. For example, now that these
various entrepreneurial training programs can envision a new customer base,
they have become highly motivated to provide training in accessible sites only
and to receive training and support from VR on altering curricula to a variety
of accessible formats. One new "partner" has pioneered the use of
tutors in the training sessions and "business mentors" to assist
ongoing business ventures. Another has introduced interactive television as a
medium to deliver training and technical assistance to potential entrepreneurs
for whom mobility or rural isolation may necessitate additional accommodation
measures. Undoubtedly, a most important aspect of this self-employment
initiative which must be sustained is the continued establishment and
maintenance of community linkages with existing self-employment resources.
There is a genuine desire on the part of our new partners to add people with
disabilities to their missions and there is a genuine need on the part of
project participants to receive the assistance of these resources and the
necessary accommodations to make meaningful participation possible.
Customer Changes: Because
the successfully self-employed person possesses a wide variety of business
skills, (e.g. product development, marketing, bookkeeping, management,
scheduling, etc.) potential
entrepreneurs have need to assess their current level of expertise in these
areas in order to both explore a business possibility and pursue education and
training that will enhance their business knowledge. To that end, a variety of
ongoing training and technical assistance options have been identified and
made available for entrepreneurs. For example, a course on self-employment
considerations offered by one of our new partners entitled, "Getting
Serious" provides introductory information for customers (as well as
counselors) who have no previous background in self-employment. This offering
affords the customer an opportunity to assess the current desirability of
self-employment as an option and the discrepancies between an individual's
current and necessary skills and support needs. For "serious"
participants, this can be followed by a fifteen week program entitled
"Start-Up" in which participants write a business plan. In addition,
they provide on-going workshops such as "Strategic Planning" to
people already in business to help with such issues as tax planning, financial
controls and marketing strategies. For some entrepreneurs, another option has
had a great deal of appeal. Another of our new partners offers a seventy-two
hour self-employment workshop through the Vermont Interactive Television (VIT)
network. The VIT network allows for simultaneous training in twelve sites in
Vermont ensuring access to all urban and rural areas of the state. In addition
several other entrepreneurial resources within Vermont are now realizing there
is a vast untapped market for their services and are coming forward with their
offerings and their requests to learn more about accommodations for people
with diverse needs.
Counselor Changes: DVR
staff also require support and training specific to self-employment to enhance
their roles in the employment decision-making process. To that end, each of
the four VR regions in Vermont have designated a staff member to become the
"self-employment liaison" in their region. Through the VIT network,
these counselors are able to attend the previously mentioned workshop sessions
with the new entrepreneurs. Other VR staff access a 12 hour "Train the
Trainers" course on self-employment to gain exposure to the full workshop
without the in-depth coverage. These self-employment training activities have
promoted a partnership between VR staff and their customers which ensures both
an atmosphere that encourages self-employment as a legitimate VR outcome and a
common set of knowledge of self-employment information. As previously
mentioned, the counselor is not expected to become the self-employment expert
but they are the expert on disability-related issues relative to accessing
these offerings for people with diverse learning styles and accommodation
needs. The counselors role is to assist the self-employment
"partners" to be able to attract and serve a segment of their
potential customer base that was previously inaccessible to them while making
new self-employment resources available to people with disabilities. It is
these "partners" who then teach people how to manage and assess the
relative health and well-being of their businesses and needs for additional
support, training or resources.
The Business Resource Group:
Another form of support and business assistance that has been developed by the
Choice Project is "peer support" through Business Resource Groups (BRG's).
A group of 8-10 entrepreneurs, who are starting new businesses or in need of
capital for existing small businesses, enter into a partnership with a local
bank. The bank offers low-interest loans and financial planning assistance to
group members. Many VR customers express a desire to become self-employed but,
due primarily to issues of poverty and complications from their disability,
have not had the opportunity to establish a good credit history. The peer
group affords a way for people to become established with their local banks or
other lending institutions and ensure the availability of needed capital for
their business ventures.
There are a number of advantages
to this peer lending and support group concept including giving members: 1)
quick access to credit, building credit histories and experience in accessing
capital; 2) a sustained group structure that fosters mutual assistance,
support and encouragement in developing viable businesses; and 3) practical
technical assistance that is pertinent to small scale business ventures.
However, without access to capital, the group members would not be able to
fully achieve their self-employment goals. The bank partner affords them the
opportunity to access needed capital.
An arrangement like this allows
VR to stretch limited resources because people are shifting their focus to the
bank partner for ongoing funding needs for their ventures. In the one pilot
currently underway, VR acts as the guarantor of 100% of each members
initial loan up to $1500. Subsequent loans which may be for larger amounts are
guaranteed by the VR agency at a reduced percentage until the bank and the
business owner assume full responsibility for the loan. In an arrangement such
as this, the bank is gaining access to a number of new customers that they
would not otherwise be able to accommodate, and people with disabilities are
able to establish credit histories and gain access to meaningful careers.
Documenting Employment Outcomes and
Achieving Economic Stability
The
Federal Register (February 11, 1997-Rules and Regulations, 361.56) lists the
current five VR indicators which are required in order to determine that an
"employment outcome" has been achieved. They are as follows:
(a) the provision of services
under the individual's IWRP (written plan) has contributed to the achievement
of the employment outcome;
(b) the employment outcome is
consistent with the individual's strengths, resources, priorities, concerns,
abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice;
(c) the employment outcome is in
the most integrated setting possible consistent with the individual's informed
choice;
(d) the individual has
maintained the employment outcome for at least 90 days; and
(e) at the end of the
appropriate period under (d) of this section the individual and the
rehabilitation counselor or coordinator consider the employment outcome to be
satisfactory and agree that the individual is performing well on the job.
It is relatively easy to
determine when the first four (a-d) of the five regulatory indicators of an
"employment outcome" have been achieved for both competitively
employed and self-employed people. However, indicator (e) is where the issue
of "economic stability" appears to be
addressed and is in fact the true outcome of all the other process
indicators. This is where we are asked to determine that "the outcome is
satisfactory" and "the individual is performing well on the
job." Indicators like wages, hours employed and job satisfaction provide
some indicators of economic "stability" for people who are
competitively employed. The determination that economic stability, has been
achieved for people who are self-employed, however, presents a whole new set
of challenges. It is not always possible to collect comparable indicators for
people who are self-employed. Gross income received for a business is not the
same as a paycheck. The typical self-employed person may receive a
"draw" from their company to pay personal living expenses but this
would rarely equate to income. Newly self-employed people are more likely to
be creating equity in their business than significant income for themselves.
Reporting wages of self-employed people for documentation purposes in VR will
probably never have any purpose or any value.
Vermont VR is currently
field-testing an alternate set of standards
for determining economic stability or the achievement of a significant
"employment outcome". This set of standards include a single
"core indicator" of stability, a set of six lesser or
"secondary indicators" that a business is truly a business and a
"stand-alone indicator" of a successful business. In order to be
considered successful, a business should meet the "core indicator"
plus one of the "secondary indicators" or the
"stand-alone indicator." A report on the effectiveness of this
field-test will be available by October 1998.
Core Indicator:
(of economic stability)
The business has been sustained for 180 days without
additional support from VR and
the owner is putting money back into the business to support ongoing business
expenses.
Note: For existing
businesses that have previously achieved a degree of economic stability and
are in need of Vocational
Rehabilitation services due to business instability caused by
disability-related issues, the 180-day indicator need not apply. For example,
an economically stable farmer who contracts farmer's lung disease will no
longer be able to continue farming without installing necessary
ventilation/respiration equipment. But, once this intervention has been
performed, the farmer is often able to immediately able to return to his
previous level of economic stability. Therefore, the 180-day indicator is not
necessary.
Rationale: Indicators of
self-employment stability are sufficiently more complex than employer-paid
jobs as to warrant a longer period of time prior to examining the stability
concept. In many instances, the 180- day figure will prove insufficient even
when paired with one of the secondary indicators below and, by mutual
agreement between customer and counselor, this period may be extended. The
second part of this indicator speaks to "putting money back into the
business." A business may appear to be stable, but if company revenues
are not returned to the business, a false impression is created. In order to
be successful, a portion of revenues must be returned for future purchases.
(e.g. equipment, inventory, marketing, expansion,
etc.)
Secondary
Indicators: (that a business is
truly a business)
1) a decrease in public benefits. (e.g. SSI, ANFC,
food stamps, housing subsidy, Medicaid, mental health services, etc.)
Rationale: A person may
have a stable business venture without producing
enough income to eliminate public benefits entirely. Business revenues may be
used to support or expand the business as opposed to becoming countable
income.
2) works not less than 20 hours in the business and
these hours are dedicated to income generating activity.
Rationale: The Social
Security Administration uses the 20 hour figure as an indicator of significant
business activity.
3) has registered the business with the Secretary of
State's office and filed a business tax return with the IRS.
Rationale: This is simply
another way to further determine that a business is a legal entity.
Note: The reasons for registering the business include: a)
ownership of the business name; b) legal right to claim bad debts; c) business
is able to establish a track record for future lending needs; and d) only a
registered business can purchase business insurance.
4) has a net profit or a significant gross income.
Rationale: Gross income
is included since business expenses or reinvestment in the business may negate
net profit.
5) has hired employees for the business.
Rationale: expansion to
the point of hiring employees indicates an increased level of stability.
6) has increased equity in the business.
Rationale: Similar to #4
above, increased business equity results typically from increased revenues and
is an indicator of growth and stability.
Stand-alone
indicator: (of economic stability)
For a person receiving SSDI benefits, the termination of
these benefits due to income means that, by SSA definition, the person is
earning enough to produce what is considered a living wage and has been able
to sustain that wage for a considerable time.
These multiple indicators and
various combinations are probably more indicative of our inability to capture
a decent definition and therefore a compromise to enable the counselor to
reach an agreed upon point of stability with the customer. In certain
situations, the counselor and the customer can also mutually agree upon
additional or alternative indicators to fit a unique situation. Further
discussion and testing of these measures will continue.
Self-Employment Findings
Business Start-ups:
Over the first 48 months of the Choice Project, a total of 113
self-employment business plans have been written. This represents 24.1% of all
IWRP'S written in the Choice Project. Of the 113 individuals who have written
business plans, 71 are currently self-employed and generating some income from
their businesses. Seventeen people have since decided that this was not
something they truly wanted to pursue and have abandoned their self-employment
plans. Seven of these seventeen people have become competitively employed and
the other ten remain unemployed.
Twenty-seven percent of all people successfully employed
by the project are self-employed as compared to 2.5 percent in the Vermont VR
program overall. These figures are presented here to demonstrate the
tremendous interest in self-employment when that option is truly available to
VR customers.
Vermont VR's most recent
statistical report (3/1/98) shows a sudden increase in self-employment
outcomes in the State VR Program overall. For the 12 month period reporting
period, a total of 37 employment outcomes were achieved in self-employment as
compared to an average of 21 over the previous four comparable reporting
periods, an increase of 57% in a single year. It truly seems that the
experience of the Choice Project in self-employment is being adapted
statewide.
Economic development: The
71 operating businesses have hired a total of 34 employees and 18
(53%) are people with disabilities who have also received services from
VR. This is presented as an example of how a significant "paradigm"
shift to customer-directed services has the potential for producing some
dramatic unanticipated outcomes.
Business Demographics:
Thirty four of the 113 people (30%) pursuing
a self-employment goal have been previously self-employed. Fourteen (12%) are
expanding current businesses and 88% are new business start-ups. Ninety-seven
(86%) are sole proprietors, thirteen (12%) are partnerships and 3 are
corporations.
Profile of the Business
Owners: Twelve percent of all current Vermont VR customers have been
previously served by VR. However, 27% of the people pursuing self-employment
are former VR "clients". The average client is 35 years old compared
to 48 for people pursuing self-employment. The person pursuing self-employment
is more likely to be married. (58% vs. 28%) and 17% of the self-employed group
have never been married as compared to 49% in the general VR population.
Supports to accomplish
business plans: Eighty-one of the 113 people pursuing self-employment or
72% have received significant levels of technical assistance from business
consultants. The vast majority of that assistance has been in the areas of: 1)
business plan development; 2) developing a marketing plan; 3) financial
management; and 4) tax preparation and record-keeping. These include a variety
of private consultants and free services available in most communities. The
most important single source of support and assistance for entrepreneurs has
been the Vermont State Office on Economic Development who maintains a
directory of all available resources statewide. Seventeen percent of the
individuals contributed significant personal resources, 13% received bank
loans and 10% used Social Security approved PASS plans. On average, Vermont
DVR provided $2691 to business start-up activities.
Regional
Differences: Vermont's Choice Project has a counselor in each of the four
VR regions of Vermont. Each individual counselor brought a different comfort
level to the self-employment initiative. One had been successfully
self-employed operating a landscaping business. Another is currently
self-employed on a part-time business as a bill collector and a landlord. The
other two counselors had no self-employment background and were lifelong human
services employees. Over 75% of the business start-ups in the first 36 months
came from the two regions where the counselor has some self-employment
experience. Over the past year, there has been a significant shift towards
more equitable distribution of self-employment plans across regions. These
data, of course, confirm to a degree that counselor knowledge and lack of
experience needs to be addressed while moving towards self-employment as a VR
option.
Summary
Current efforts to ensure customer choice of services
and careers have led VR to recognize the one significant area where true choice
has not occurred. VR has incorporated self-employment into its array of options
because of a desire and a commitment to proclaim that real choice of careers
exists in Vermont. The Choice Project has been instrumental in making this
commitment a reality by tackling the three major identified barriers to
self-employment: VR policy, conventional wisdom and counselor fears. If 14% of
people choose to become self-employed and we help only 2.5% achieve this goal,
we are denying a major choice. In addition, as small businesses continue to
capture an ever increasing share of the national labor market, Vocational
Rehabilitation programs everywhere need to consider ways to direct resources to
more effectively serve people who would achieve their greatest success by
working for themselves.
For additional
information contact: Michael Collins:
Tele:
802-241-3196 or e-mail at michael@dad.state.vt.us
Aley, J. (1993). Debunking the
failure fallacy. Fortune, 128(5), 21.
Arnold, N., and Seekins, T.
(1994). Self-employment as a vocational rehabilitation closure: An examination
of state policies. Journal of Disability
Policy Studies, 5(2).
Arnold, N., Seekins, T., and
Ravesloot (1995). Self-employment as vocational
rehabilitation closure in urban and rural areas.
Rehabilitation Counseling
Bulletin.39(2), 94-106.
Assets: A Quarterly Update for
Innovators. (Winter, 1997). Washington D.C.
Corporation for Enterprise Development. pp. 3-7.
Chandler, S.K., and Czerlinsky,
T. (1993). Empowerment issues for
rehabilitation counselors and service providers: training manual. Dallas,
TX: UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation.
Clark, P., and Huston, T.
(1993). Assisting the smallest business:
Assessing micro-enterprise
development as a strategy for boosting poor communities.
Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
Hagner, D. and Dileo, D. (1993) Working
Together: Workplace Culture,
Supported Employment and People with Disabilities. Cambridge MA:
Brookline Books.
Holmes, G. (1994). Historical
roots of the empowerment dilemma in rehabilitation. Journal
of Disability Policy Studies, (4), 1-18.
National Institute for the
Severely Handicapped. (1996). Review of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of
1992: Rehab Act Primer. 2 (10) 4-8.
Osborne, Eleanor. (1997) Taking
Care of Business. Vermont Women's
Directory >97. Vol.7. 10-11.
Ravesloot, C., and Seekins, T.,
(1996). Vocational Rehabilitation counselors attitudes toward self-employment
outcomes: Attitudes and their effects on the use of self-employment as an
employment option. Rehabilitation
Counseling Bulletin.
Rehab Brief. (1994). Empowerment
Counseling: consumer& counselor relationships in the rehabilitation process.
Vol. XVI, No. 6.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of
1992. P.L. 102-569
Vermont Vocational
Rehabilitation Services Manual. Rev. (1997)